Chủ Nhật, 30 tháng 4, 2017

Dark stuff page 1

parmasson
February 5th, 2006, 11:35 PM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4679220.stm

"Astronomers cannot detect dark matter directly because it emits no light or radiation."

How . . . no temp? But it moves? :eek:

?
Merxiless
February 16th, 2006, 10:21 PM
What is done is:

Calculate the rotational velocity at a specified distance of a galaxy, or this galaxy, by the frequecy shift of stars in their spectra, to determine if they are approaching or receding, and in what basic direction.

From that rotational velocity, it can be calculated what the average speed should be at a specific radius from the galactic center, based on the gravitational constant, andorbital mechanics.

Since these speeds are faster than they should be, it is inferred that there is more mass available in the galaxy than can be seen, based on stellar density, which makes the whole shebang rotate faster.

Part of it is likely the Black Hole at galactic center in Sagittarius, but farther out in the spiral arms, this effect is diminished, thus leading to the search for more "Unseen" Mass.

Very similar to the way the outer planets of our solar system were found.

Unless of course, this is not what you meant.
Fritz_Brown
February 17th, 2006, 08:55 AM
Which is a long, geeky way of saying it's a fudge factor. My equation doesn't work, but if I put in a large X on one side, it works now. That X is dark matter.
Merxiless
February 17th, 2006, 01:01 PM
Bang! you got me.

Gotta love that diceless roleplay.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét